Florida

FSU Forced to Vacate 2007 National Title, Official Release

By: Jason Byrne - jbyrne@milesplit.us
Published: 2010-02-08 19:12:00

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – “Obviously we’re disappointed with the NCAA’s vacation of wins and how it affects our Track & Field program,” FSU Head Coach Bob Braman said. “None of our athletes that were involved in the academic misconduct case needed the course in order to be NCAA eligible so it’s unfortunate that certain student-athletes made wrong choices when they clearly didn’t have to. 

 

“Our Men’s Track & Field program is learning a very painful lesson. The vacation of a National Title is certainly more punitive than perhaps the loss of regular season wins in a non-championship type season, but that is the potential outcome when student-athletes make poor decisions.

 

We understand and accept the NCAA’s penalty, but want to point out that without any gained eligibility we gained no unfair advantage over our opponents.  We would have won that Title with or without that on-line course.

 

I’m very proud of our academic history of our Track & Field teams.  In the past five years we’ve had the most Academic All-Americans in Track & Field of any school in the country.  Highlighted, of course, by 2006 NCAA Shot Put Champion and Rhodes Scholar

 

Garrett Johnson.  We also have regularly been at the top of the ACC in number of All-Academic Track & Field performers, and in fact led the ACC in Men’s and Women’s All-Academic honorees in both Indoor and Outdoor Track & Field last year.

 

We as coaches will double our efforts to instill only the finest values in our athletes and provide them with exemplary leadership in athletics, in the classroom and in life.” 

 

Comments

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post. Login or Register.
JAPSJN wrote
at February 02, 2010 21:07 EST
Dang. That sucks. Were the athletes that got caught competing in the NCAA championship met?
jason wrote
at February 02, 2010 21:42 EST
Yes. There was one "illegal" athlete competing.
jamfsu wrote
at February 02, 2010 08:41 EST
Was he on a relay, being a person who could have been replaced?
jason wrote
at February 02, 2010 10:57 EST
I won't answer any more questions so the person is not called out. But, yes, it was a relay team that was disqualified that made the point difference to put them in second after those points were subtracted.